UK man wins court case against BBC for 911 cover up

March 31, 2015 5:53 pm 3 comments Views:

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World

Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.

Get More Right To Your Inbox!

  • I know….Most Americans do not even wants to think about.

  • Stewart Dent

    Interesting the judge was brave enough to make this decision, I hope the Ministry of Truth/BBC gets what it needs.

  • Toy Pupanbai

    Well done. Who/what, is the element in the BBC that has been ordered to support the falsehoods?