Can nature rescue us from the threat of flooding?

February 16, 2014 3:16 pm Comments Off on Can nature rescue us from the threat of flooding? Views: 31366

As politicians in the UK argue over how to fund flood defences in the future, Channel 4 News finds six restoration projects that have been successful in protecting communities.

Somerset Levels (Reuters)

Many experts believe that restoring rivers to something closer to their natural behaviour can help alleviate floods.

They say that natural flood risk management can be more effective than traditional hard-engineered approaches.

A recent study by the European Centre for River Restoration and Wetlands International looked at six renovation projects where re-connecting a river with its floodplain had reduced flooding.

Ritobäcken Brook, Finland

The restoration of Ritobäcken Brook was carried out to address flooding and to reduce the need to maintain the river channel.

This was achieved by cutting a new channel, which allowed the river channel to carry more water.

The risk of flooding has been reduced and there have been improvements in wildlife and water quality.

Funded by the regional environmental authority, Uusimaa ELY-centre. Cost: £12,000, planning £2,000

The Isar River (Getty)

Isar River, Munich, Germany

The “Isar Plan” (above) was developed to improve flood control, to improve plant, fish and animal habitats, and to increase opportunities for recreation.

These issues were addressed by regrading river banks, setting back flood defences and creating public beaches. The results have been dramatic, particularly considering its urban location: the risk of flooding has been reduced, the local ecology enhanced and public access to the area improved.

Funded by the state funding, with high public consultation. Cost: £28,680

River Vida, Tonder, Denmark

Reducing the risk of flooding, tackling subsidence and improving access for fish was dealt with by removing sluice gates and installing a weir, allowing fish to swim over more easily.

Retaining the historic mill and mill pond were central to the scheme. Economic, social and environmental benefits have been reported in a project that dealt sensitively with the cultural heritage at the site.

Funuded by EU LIFE+. Cost: £1,122,000

River Great Ouse, Milton Keynes

Privately funded through gravel extraction, this project has successfully tackled the risk of flooding, improved the quality of the landscape, and plant and wildlife, and created educational opportunities.

Funded by private investment from Hanson Aggregates Ltd through commercial gravel extraction. Cost: £918,000

Mayes Brook, Mayesbrook Park

Mayes Brook, Mayesbrook Park

Mayesbrook Park (above) is the UK’s first climate change adaption park. Reconnecting the river with its floodplain has increased flood storage by one hectare.

Restoration has improved access, recreation and plant and wildlife for the local community. An ecosystem services study estimated the project would produce a wide range of benefits.

Picture above supplied by the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

Funded by multipartnerships including the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and a private insurance firm. Cost: £3,114,000

River Marden, Calne, Wiltshire

As part of a larger town centre regeneration project, the River Marden, which had previously been straightened, was re-meandered and stone, gravel and planting were used to create a more natural river channel.

The project has reduced the risk of flooding in the town and increased public access to the river.

Get More Right To Your Inbox!

Comments are closed