15-year-old girl learns the truth about the holohoax, submits a report and gets an A


A 15-year-old girl from Southern California who attends a public high school tells the story of how she recently became aware of questions concerning the holocaust. After hearing the establishment’s version of the ‘shoah’ in her history class for weeks along with persistent rumors that Obamacare included provisions for microchipping all Americans, she was very upset at all the frightening and traumatizing details. But then she had an encounter which led her to question what she had been taught, and decided to conduct her own investigation.

Upon completion of her research, she decided to submit a report for a school project in an elective class she was taking for extra credit. She titled it ‘Holohoax,’ and got an A on the report! Unfortunately for the regime, the widely accepted version of the ‘holocaust’ which has been passed down for generations and constantly promoted through Hollywood propaganda films is not enough to brainwash the youth, who are increasingly thinking for themselves, outside the box.


A lie known worldwide, spreading to clueless people and creating disaster everywhere, has caused so many German lives to be spitefully taken. The “Holocaust”, an alleged story of millions of Jews being tortured in concentration camps, has been proven time and time again to be inaccurate, For the acclaimed number of murdered Jews to be true is impossible, proven so not only by logic, but also the fact that the “survivors” of these evens have been known to and even admitted to being paid to lie about it. This in itself should be proof enough of this act of misleading propaganda being false, but there is indeed more evidence.

One reason to believe that the Holocaust is a lie is that the Jews claimed to have been murdered in gas chambers, groups as a time. However, no evidence of such occurrences has been shown or documented. According to scientists who were assigned to study the bodies of the victims of World War 2, “Most of them died from typhus epidemics. Most of the rest of them died from starvation and lack of medical supply care resulting from allied bombing raids against food and medical supply lines. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax) The Jews show pictures of hair and clothing of women and children, claiming that they were used for soap and rugs after their owners being stripped of them and brutally killed. However, the truth lies in the fact that “The Germans were against typhus, which was the real reason for shaving heads, fumigating buildings, and cremating corpses.” (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=holohoax) Also, heads were shaved and people were gathered top be treated not with lethal gases in order to commit genocide, but with repellant, to stop the epidemic of head lice spreading throughout the camps.

Another thing that contradicts the lies of faulty “survivors” is that the number of Jews said to be killed in the camps was inaccurately stated. Six million Jews were supposedly killed in the Holocaust, when not even such an amount existed in Europe entirely, let alone Germany. “In 1939, there were nearly 15,700,000 Jews in the world. After the Second World War that number had risen to over 18,000,000 Jews. What this means is that of the 15,000,000 original Jews on the planet, 6,000,000 were gassed, leaving only some 9,000,000-plus. Then, the world Jewish population rebounded and doubled to over 18,000,000 in less than nine years – an astronomical feat, which astounded biologists and baby doctors everywhere!” (http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2009/09/fun-facts-holohoax-for-dummies.html) Not only were the Jews not murdered, but were give a choice. “For that we must go back to one Ilea Ehrenburg,* chief Soviet propagandist during the Second World War and later on to die in Israel, who coined the mythic number on Dec. 22, 1944 – BEFORE tens of thousands of Jewish internees, given the choice of staying to be “liberated” by the Communists or going with their German captors, did not hesitate to choose the latter option!” (http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.com/2009/09/fun-facts-holohoax-for-dummies.html) Thus proving that the Jewish population was not forced to concentration camps to be scalped and gassed.

Not only do we have visible proof of the holocaust being a lie, but also some very trustworthy witness: The American Red Cross. The Red Cross was asked to do an investigation and search of the camps and corpses, and make accurate reports on their findings. “Says the Report: ‘In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorized to stay in each camp …’ (Vol. III, p. 83).” (http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd01.html) In reading this, one may conclude that the Germans did not intentionally kill the Jews, but strove to maintain lives. Many of the allegations against the Germans made by Jews involved gas chambers, which they claimed to be stripped, shaved, and gathered into for a mass killing. However, in order for a gas chamber to exist on a premise, there must be airtight doors and high chimneys, neither of which was found at the former “death camps.” Also, there is no proof of the gassed Jews except for allegations made by hired phony witnesses. According to the Red Cross, “Though six million Jews supposedly died in the gas chambers, not one body has ever been autopsied and found to have died of gas poisoning. We have been shown piles of bodies from World War II, but most of these persons died of typhus or starvation or Allied bombings and a great many of those were murdered Germans – the equivalent of ten football fields should be packed full of gassed bodies to present as evidence, yet not one body has ever been discovered.” (http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm) If this is not proof enough, what else is needed? What excuse can be made in retort?

This is not to say that the Holocaust did not take place. It is only to prove that it did not happen as it was told according to the Jews. Not only in the camps, but all over the world, people died; suffered from starvation, typhus and bombing raids in World War 2. Lastly, without being given the evidence that it did happen as it is told, we are shown clues that the effects on Europe of World War 2 was much different; not a story that would benefit the Jews, giving them compensation each month for some thing that was simply a hyperbole.

Get More Right To Your Inbox!

  • Zed

    I do not doubt that there are plenty of lies perpetrated by our government and others regarding the events of WWII and the Holocaust. However, I do have to say that something horrific happened there. My father, a WWII veteran, at the end of the war was reassigned to aid in the cleanup of one of the death camps. His job was to operate a scoop loader and dump countless bodies into mass graves. He was just a common soldier and not part of a propaganda conspiracy. As a result of his first-hand experience in these events, he came home with as extreme a case of PTSD (of course, undiagnosed in those days) as anyone can imagine. He is gone now, but he lived with that trauma for the rest of his life and we, his family, still live with it today. That kind of multi-generational trauma does not come from a hoax.

  • J. Story

    There was an interesting TV show a few days ago in the UK about recently discovered transcriptions of recordings that MI-16 (military intelligence) secretly made of German prisoners, both enlisted and officers. A number of them recounted either seeing or participating in mass execution of Jews: men, women and children.

  • Vanessa

    ‘What excuse can be made in retort?’

    This is report awful and honestly I don’t think it should be given a space on a website where it is presented as a likely explanation – what are we supposed to take from reading this? That this fifteen year old girl has read some conspiracy theories online and made a controversial report for a school assignment? That is what it should be presented at, but I fear people might believe what they read.
    I have heard of people write all sorts of unorthodox essays when applying to top universities – like ‘How Stalin was a sweetie’, because it can seem intelligent to think outside the box on some matters and look at subjects from obscure angles, but I get the impression that this girl has been convinced by her own unsubstantiated research. I say that because unless it was edited for this webarticle she gave no justifications to any of her large generalising points e.g ‘Thus proving that the Jewish population was not forced to concentration camps to be scalped and gassed’, and I feel like I have to say this because I am also fifteen and at school studying WW2 history, and therefore would see myself an equal individual to her that can counter her argument and hopefully provide a balance.
    I also take religious studies where we cover the holocaust, as well history and I really think she is being ridiculous. Where were all the gassed bodies? they burned them, and did their best to destroy the towers before the liberators arrived. The poison she claims was to ‘kill lice’ was purchased in ginormous quantities from companies like BMW and as we all know pumped into chambers – in volumes not tolerable for humans to endure. This girl almost tries to imply the Nazis were showing compassion ‘the Germans did not intentionally kill the Jews, but strove to maintain lives.’ as well as claiming ‘not murdered, but were give a choice.’ I am not attacking her because she wrote an essay about something that I think isn’t true, I am just outraged that she appears to have stumbled into believing it herself – sure some of the points she raises are interesting, but not conclusive. And slipping one sentence in at the end that says ‘This is not to say that the Holocaust did not take place’ does not make it an unbiased essay, especially because the first paragraph contains the line ‘This in itself should be proof enough of this act of misleading propaganda being false, but there is indeed more evidence.’ In addition to that, the girl referred to the oppressed as though they were pining for the genocide of their kind to be true ‘the Jews claimed to be murdered… The Jews show pictures of hair that they claim was…’ and implying that they were fronting this as a ‘story that would benefit the Jews’.
    All I can say is, in England, that would have not got an A. And if I have brought even one person who was convinced of a ‘holohoax’ back to their senses with my rant, I haven’t wasted my time. You must ask yourself, if there is really all this evidence that the it never happened, why is it illegal in Germany to deny the Holocaust?