Ginger Destroys Cancer More Effectively than Death-Linked Cancer Drugs

July 7, 2013 3:58 pm 18 comments Views: 2628

Ginger, a cousin spice of super anti-cancer substance turmeric, is known for its ability to shrink tumors. Astoundingly, it is even more effective than many cancer drugs, which have been shown to be completely ineffective and actually accelerate the death of cancer patients. Commonly consumed across the world in small doses among food and beverage products, the medicinal properties of ginger far surpass even advanced pharmaceutical inventions.

dswaqThe subject of one study based out of Georgia State University, whole ginger extract was revealed to shrink prostate tumor size by a whopping 56% in mice.

The anticancer properties were observed in addition to ginger’s role in reducing inflammation as well as being a rich source of life-enhancing antioxidants.

But what about cancer drugs? Could this simple spice really topple the advanced pharmaceuticals that are often touted as the ‘only option’ for cancer patients by medical doctors?

It turns out that cancer drugs are not only severely ineffective at permanently shrinking tumors, but they actually make tumors larger and kill the patient more quickly.

More specifically, the tumors have been found to ‘metasize’, meaning they come back bigger and more stronger than their original size. What’s more, the ‘metasizing’ was found to be very aggressive. According to scientists Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, the premium priced drugs were little more than death sentences for many patients.

“Whatever manipulations we’re doing to tumors can inadvertently do something to increase the tumor numbers to become more metastatic, which is what kills patients at the end of the day,” said study author Dr. Raghu Kalluri.

These are the very drugs considered to be the scientifically proven solution by mainstream health officials.

Meanwhile, ginger presents virtually no side effects and has been used as a food product by many cultures for countless centuries. Instead of creating super tumors, whole ginger extract was shown to exert significant growth-inhibiting and death-inductory effects in a spectrum of prostate cancer cells.

Get More Right To Your Inbox!

  • veronica castro

    True. My father had cancer at age 63. He died at age 82,when his cancer metastasized reaching his, liver. Although,he had,five,years,,chemo and was taking pharmaceutical medicines he was a ginger drinker all those years,not a day with out,drinking ginger tea. Now ,I’m know. Why.

  • virgoyap

    It’s too good to be true.

  • Felipe Soriano

    The earlier we believe this article , the better. And don’t forget, the best health maintainer is EXERCISE. At 71, I don’t have any medication, no visit to the doctor, no ailments, and most importantly, I am enjoying my life. Once in a while just to humor myself, when I see a free blood checker in the mall, I had my blood pressure checked and it always come out consistent no matter how far I have walked around the mall, 110-120 over 70. I have a blood pressure checker at home, but I don’t use it.

    • Mario San Antonio

      felipe, i am just curious. what kind of exercises have proven more beneficial to you? do you go to a gym? how often and what exercises do you do? i am 61, goes to gym 3x a week on average, does tread mill (30-45 min) and some light weights. i have read that seniors should not really indulge in heavy exercises…after reading the article above, i plan to drink ginger (salabat) more often…right now i have no serious health issues except cholesterol for which i am taking simvastatin. my doctor however told me before that i need not take it as long as i do regular exercises.

      • Felipe Soriano

        I do exercise every other day. My exercise is combination cardio and muscle toning by using weights. I do this at home. I have a half basketball court where I do shooting for warm up and run 10 rounds for my cardio. After that, I do weights using 10 lb dumb bells in 6 different sets of 20 repetitions. Then 25 lb barbell in 3 sets of 20 repetitions. During non exercise days, I putter around the house and backyard. Most importantly, I do enjoy my most important human right, if you know what I mean.

        • Mario San Antonio

          hahaha… good to know you still enjoy your most important right… i hope it is not your right to religion hehehe… but seriously, you still enjoy it… “singlehandedly”? or in tandem with one considerably your junior?

          • Felipe Soriano

            Dedicated to someone reasonably attractive of course, if not, too difficult to imagine and if that’s the case, rather go singlehandedly. Hehehe!

          • Mario San Antonio

            good to know. thanks. you seem to be highly intelligent and true to the adage… the higher the IQ, the greater the drive to exercise that ‘right’ and of course as long as one is healthy, this important right will never remain unused. it goes without saying, the more attractive (and younger) the partner the better the performance…hahaha.

    • mamerto

      God Blesses some more than others.
      You are in this “some” group.

      PS…
      HE may be bestowing His blessings upon you because
      you are taking very well of His “temple” which is your body.
      Bless you.

  • Josephine Jaron Codilla

    Messrs. Soriano and San Antonio, you both rock!

    • Cajun Exile

      Do we know each other?

      • Josephine Jaron Codilla

        No, Sir. I just happened to read your nice comments, also of Messrs. Soriano and San Antonio yesterday. In fact I was looking for this to share to give hope to those who think they’re past their prime. 🙂

  • Jorge anselmo de jesus

    Your column helps people with health problem continue the good work , you are helping many depressed family . Medicine recommend by doctors are not all accurate . Your column is always timely . Add more about diabetis . God bless you who are involved in this column . Love you for what you do .

  • mamerto

    Has anyone ever tried to “imagine” &/or analyze/rationalize
    HOW a Chemo-Drug “works against cancer-cells”…?

    Does it “search and destroy”…, seeking-out those “alien-evil-cells” or
    is it just a matter of “trial-&-error”…, of “taking-in” the good-with-the-bad…?
    IF it’s the latter…, then HOW can it eliminate all those cancer-cells…, without
    also eliminating all/most-of-the-good-cells.
    How can a cancer-patient hope to be cured when most-if-not-all of his good-cells are gone.?